• I’ve decided it’s time to formally do some meditation teaching

    by  • August 12, 2008 • Iceland, Personal • 5 Comments

    It’s a bit interesting. The question is, given my perspective, why? There’s a ton of sources out there, written, books, tapes and so on that are perfectly adequate. I’m not qualified to teach advanced practices (being trained in a thing is not the same as being trained to teach people a thing, as anybody who drives will tell you) so it’s not about absolute availability of the tech. Some of it is lineage and current membership – making this particular body of material available in Iceland, although (of course) Ananda Marga has a significant following here, and what they are doing is not a million light years from the tradition of my own teachers.

    I think I have two things to put on the table. Firstly, a fluid discourse about the scientific method and the mystical traditions of India involving pretty seriously thought out material on the nature of the scientific insight on the nature of truth, the yogic nature of truth, and a point-by-point comparison that lets people easily understand how the nature of observed truth is changed by the precise axioms of the modes of rational enquiry picked. The crucial axiom from my perspective is that disciplined observation starts at the objects visible to the five senses for science, vs. in meditation and yoga where it starts at the horizon of consciousness, cataloging and observing inner experiences, thoughts and feelings as if they were birds or plants or physical phenomena.

    That distinction – where do you start observing the universe – critically affects one’s conclusions about the nature of reality. It also critically changes the degree to which physical objectivity is a product of the work – for good and perhaps ill.

    So, anyway, that’s one thing – I can discuss the scientific method and the yogic method as modes of enquiry into reality with defined principles for discovering truth which have many similarities and a few key well-defined differences, particularly in areas like access to instrumentation.

    The second thing is that I think a few of my friends could do to see me in serious mode. It’s not real obvious seeing me noodling around Reykjavik that if I was in India odds-are people would expect me to be in robes and giving out public blessings on special occasions – and if I was in India, I’d have to learn a ton of the local conventions to be able to play the role!!! – but none the less, it’s true. I spent pretty much 15 years with my personal spiritual enquiry as the primary product of my life, and that time was not wasted – when I turned back out to the world, it was with a new eye. So I’ve got a few buddies who’ve expressed an interest in meditation, and it’s a lot easier to hear that stuff from somebody who’s in a consecrated space and is laying it down old school, rather than discussing generalities in bars.

    Fundamentally, I’m a meditation teacher who’s been choosing not to teach to focus on other things. But now I sense that it’s time to rebalance that, and that the actual primary lifesaving work would benefit from me actually assuming the role once in a while, and making the systems that bring things to light available for the (surprisingly few!) people who want them.

    Meditation in these traditions is not for sissies or mugs. It’s difficult, painful work because it means examining the fundamental limits of being human: what the buddha discussed as old age, sickness, death and “dukkha” as well as our old friend impermanence. But we see the suffering that comes from those processes as avidya, false knowledge, caused by mistaking tailor’s dummies for real people in a car crash, for example. When you actually see birth and death clearly, with a kingfisher’s eye (see “finite and infinite games”) much becomes simplified. When suffering, pain, violence and torture are understood – and I’m not saying this is fun – one can break out of the frozen horror which we so often feel when confronted by those unpleasant aspects of human nature and do what needs to be done if anything can be.

    Human nature is made of unexamined assumptions. If you start seriously questioning how you got to be the way you are, you discover a lot of “memetic” (ideas, language) material that simply wound up in your head because it wound up in the head of your parents and teachers and they repeated. Questioning and reality testing that material results in fairly radical personal change against or at least away from cultural norms. Going further to examine our basis of biological instincts to see how much freedom our intelligence and rationality can win from the patterns of behavior that went straight from genetic storage to our minds constitutes a second degree of freedom. Past that, there is the level of pure philosophy where we examine how we know what we know, and what it means to believe that we know anything at all, right down into cogito ergo sum and the territory of being and nothingness.

    I can cut through the crap, and teach the techniques which enable other people to cut through the crap. I just didn’t for a while because other things were more urgent, and also very much needed activities. But now it’s time for me to rebalance the material and spiritual work at something closer to 50/50 and that means making available the more serious side of what I do for the people who want it.

    The things I work on in the real world are serious: 30 million deaths a year from poverty, losing 25% or more of the human race to a full-severity H5N1 pandemic flu, evacuating cities after nuclear bombs have been detonated in them. I deal with death, and more essentially, with the preservation of life day in, day out, every single day. And I smile, and laugh, and have hope for the world, for humanity, and for myself.

    But every single thing on earth we have yet identified as life is dying. Even if everything I hoped for in terms of poverty and disease came to pass, old age would get us all. Even if transhumanism is fully realized, machines break down eventually. Death can be postponed a little by ordinary means, and perhaps a lot by extraordinary ones, but it is coming for everything which is.

    The certainty of the immortality of consciousness, freed from all forms and constrains, as an absolute property of being is obtained by meditation. I can teach immortality, not the attainment of it, but the recognition of it as the current position of all that lives.

    But what that means, and why I still spend all my time shoveling death into the ground and raising life from it is a mystery that has to be seen and not explained.

    flattr this!

    About

    Vinay Gupta is a consultant on disaster relief and risk management.

    http://hexayurt.com/plan

    5 Responses to I’ve decided it’s time to formally do some meditation teaching

    1. Bhukti
      August 12, 2008 at 3:38 am

      Aghori lol

      “The crucial axiom from my perspective is that disciplined observation starts at the objects visible to the five senses for science, vs. in meditation and yoga where it starts at the horizon of consciousness, cataloging and observing inner experiences, thoughts and feelings as if they were birds or plants or physical phenomena.”

      Actually you can take the 36 Tattva model and START from the five senses and then progress to higher cognizance. Pretty neat – and they map to the 36 letters of Sanskrit.

      http://www.shivashakti.com/table.htm

    2. August 12, 2008 at 3:50 am

      Damn good link. Going from the senses back is certainly an approach, although I generally think that getting firmly established in the Self before unpicking the phenomenal world is a pretty good bet.

      For anyone who’s interested, a lot more detail on this general map of reality can be found in B.K.S. Iyengar’s translation of the Yoga Sutra.

      The critical bit is the idea that the universe is defined by our ability to detect it – sound, hearing, taste and so on – these are the gates through which things come to our awareness, the senses. The cataloging of everything which can be perceived, inner or outer, by the mode of awareness used to detect it is the core of that approach (from my perspective.)

      I wish people realized just how directly this kind of stuff is about perception – things that anybody can see, scientific atheist or mad hindu.

    3. Bhukti
      August 12, 2008 at 3:58 am

      Some guy called Louv wrote this guide to the Tattvas and their overlap with Western science:

      http://www.horusmaat.com/silverstar/SILVERSTAR8-PG35.htm

    4. August 12, 2008 at 4:06 am

      You mean the guy who did Ultraculture?

      http://www.scribd.com/doc/18685/Ultraculture-Journal-One

      I hear it’s quite good. Not bad for a free book on the mysteries of the universe.

    5. asoka
      August 13, 2008 at 7:16 am

      Good to hear you talking about teaching meditation and getting back to a balance between outer and inner. Go for it!

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *