Skip to content

A quick life update…

My life makes even less sense than usual. Remember when I was settled in Cloughjordan Ecovillage in Ireland, putting my feet up and hunkering down for the apocalypse? Yeah, me neither. I was offered a role at Hub Westminster to “do something amazing with nights and weekends” and so I did. So I’m now back in London, in culture shock, trying to design a lifestyle that works for me including such mundanities as finding a place to live. Ah, the drama!

Truth and Beauty (#truthandbeauty) is a regular Tuesday and Thursday night events which curates a collection of the most interesting things we can find, mainly discursive on Tuesdays and mainly performative on Thursdays. We have dinner together (by the fab Munch Food, or you can bring your own), talk, get to know each other, have our horizons broadened, then have a cup of tea afterwards.

We have an intimidatingly good schedule for November: Richard Stallman, Jamais Cascio and (TBA) Pat Kane. On a lesser note, I’m doing three talks on The Future We Deserve, too, at Indy Johar’s behest.

Some details about the first talk, which is on economic geography – how the world’s money is really divided, what the real relationship is between the 1% and the rest of us, the 99%, and so on. It’s big, solid heavy-hitting stuff, and sets the stage for the next talk on Tuesday the 8th of November on governance and globalism, and the final talk on November 15th on where the real levers to solve these problems are.

Here are the slides.

There’s a write-up with notes from Ethin

The archival writeup is here, and this is a direct link to the high quality audio file.

So come on down to Truth and Beauty. There’s always going to be something fascinating and amazing going on, and we very much hope to see you at an event soon.

Avoid Winter War: Hexayurts and #Occupy

This piece appears to form the foundation of Adbusters Tactical Briefing 18, which gets the basics but misses two important points.



Hexayurt Encampment at Burning Ice, Brussels.
Click for video of the winter camp.

I’ve been getting a couple of pings a day about providing infrastructural support for #Occupy. I get pinged by email, on twitter, comments, through friends, at events. It’s taken me a while to come to a conclusion, and this post is it.

Firstly, let me lay out my political stance: any political solution must solve our problems in a global context, recognizing things like “the 1%” is anybody making more than $34,000 per year.” #Occupy is very limited in perspective, in general, to local economic issues, and lacks (so far) a discourse that speaks to my concerns about global environmental issues and resource geopolitics. So while I’m sympathetic to #Occupy, it doesn’t directly address my concerns: I hope nobody gets hurt, and that the protests generate real action on poverty and inequality within the nation states these movements exist in, but without a genuinely internationalist and global platform, this is not for me. Sorry, but that’s where I am.

Now, the second thread: advice for #Occupy on winter infrastructure. People were basically expecting something that looked like this:

  • Cheap polypropylene thermal underwear, two sets per person, with volunteer laundry services. And poly hats, too. You’ll need name tags for the laundry.
  • Synergy beds: cheap inflatable camping mattress (the 1/2″ thick kind) under a cheap foam camping mat (the 1/2″ thick kind), with a cotton sleeping bag liner to absorb moisture, a decent synthetic sleeping bag, and over the top a Heatsheet-brand space blanket (accept no substitutes) weighted at the corners or taped to the foam mat. The foam mat is essential. The synergy bed is lightweight but utter luxury – feels like a 3″ mattress!
  • Giant thermos flasks – 2.2 liters or more are cheap – and/or Jetboil stoves, which are incredibly efficient for keeping people warm by hot drinks.
  • Corrugated plastic folding hexayurts, probably the 6′ Stretch hexayurt, which builds nicely in corrugated plastic. The big hexayurt is just too big for those materials. The bigger, heavier foam insulation units probably don’t have the right dynamics for the occupation, being rather big and hard to transport. But small folding ones, ftw.
  • Use Simple Critical Infrastructure Maps (there’s a copy in the Gupta State Failure Management Archive to arrange meetings into Shelter, Supply and Safety quadrants, and learn how to use the naming scheme presented in that document to minimize or eliminate misunderstandings about infrastructure – it’s literally a series of agenda items for meetings, really, when you get right down to it! It’s a very simple, clean, efficient way to organize encampments and make sure everything gets done.

But this is totally wrong. It’s a tactical approach to a fundamentally strategic and political problem: what to do with #occupy as winter approaches!

I’m not saying there’s no value in Occupy Sustainability type appropriate technology solutions. I’m not saying that at all. But no set of kit can make your winter camps welcoming and hospitable and easy places of fellowship, not for long month-after-month occupations.

So the problem must be considered at a strategic and political level.

What I am saying is this: Avoid Winter War. Whether it’s Stalingrad or Valley Forge or the Talvisota, winter is not the friend of those involved in struggle. It might favor one side or another in terms of long term political outcomes, but both sides suffer, and the side with less support for dealing with the winter suffers doubly.

So this is my advice on winter to #Occupy. Go #homeforthanksgiving. Declare victory, tell people you’ve held out long enough to make the point, and you’re going home to your families for the holidays.

And then actually do it. Leave nothing behind but eerie silence. Clean up, Leave No Trace as they say at Burning Man, and then spend the winter getting your platform together and planning actions for the spring.

Here’s my vision: in Spring, take-and-hold land and plant a hundred thousand wild flowers. In areas with bare earth, turn up with spades and grow food. Grow-occupy (#groccupy?) But work with the forces of nature, with the cycles of the earth, and cultivate a culture of growth, expansion, beauty and harmony. In winter, you will grow to hate each other, and the system.

In the spring, you may see your way through to the universal love which changes all hearts, and into a culture of such beauty and nobility that nobody will crack your skulls for planting flowers and asking for change.

No winter war.

In the spring, make peace through beauty.

Vinay Gupta,
Hexayurt Project
If you’re new to my work, this is who I am.

Truth and Beauty, or “what in the hell is going on, Vinay?”

Once in a while, life gets complicated. That’s not usually good news, but this time is an exception. I’ll try and keep the near-infinite complexity of the situation down to a few key core facts.

* I left Ireland for a quick trip to visit the KaosPilots with Dougald (of Dark Mountain) and Barbora (of Magnificent Revolution, the bicycle power lab). It was an incredibly tough mission about challenging people’s core intellectual, personal and cultural assumptions about how the world worked, and I was left wondering about how to do that kind of education before people’s optimism has been tested against the dense stuff of life in the world. Perhaps it is perspective better learned late than early.

* On the way back to Ireland, I visited one of the launch events at Hub Westminster, a night sure to live in Infamy. Suffice it to say, after several days of intense discssion with the team there, I moved back to London to contribute something to the effort. I am now curating a series of intellectual and cultural events in the evenings at the Hub, which start tomorrow night with the first of the TRUTH AND BEAUTY lecture series.

This leaves some major personal issues unresolved for me: do I still live in Ireland? Am I less focussed on downside management, and more on creation and preservation of cultural capital? But these questions are subsidiary to the action taken – talking with Ansuman Biswas about what we might do in the space together brought me to a simple conclusion: if I do not do this, these things will not happen.

The rest is details.

We are going to start my event cycle at Hub Westminster fairly gently.

TRUTH AND BEAUTY

On Tuesday nights, at 6:45PM, there will be dinner. For the first few weeks this will be a “bring Chinese food” type event, but we anticipate having catering very soon. Of course, you will still be able to bring your own food to eat and share, we can’t suit all tastes!

At 8PM, there will be one hour of rigourous and inspiring intellectual exercise. We have a lot of smart friends, and they demand quality input, so we will try and find challenging and stimulating speakers on pertinent topics. We will keep the talks to one hour including questions, and expect to often have two or three shorter talks on a theme, debates, and other such formats. We are friendly and open to all suggested speakers, and please feel free to recommend yourself, particlarly if you bring an audience.

At 9PM, we will adjourn for tea and discussions. There may be cocktails at some future point, if we can arrange them. Around 9:30PM there will be general exodus, because those with busy lives, early starts or children need to get home and cannot fully participate in an event which goes on all night. In fairness to them, we end early. This is important for our diversity, inclusivity and sustainability. Next week, we do it all again!

Now, there is more.

BEAUTY AND TRUTH

On Thursdays, we will have a second event. While T&B is of the mind, B&T is of the senses. We will start with music, acoustic and unplugged in all probability, and likely by candle light, health and safety permitting. At first we will try for the “one hour then tea and home!” format, but Thursday is followed by Friday, a day we can face a little worn, so it may be that we will go later by degrees. But we will certainly start with an hour, and go from there.

I was asked to put something together late Thursday night. Tuesday – today, because this is after midnight! – will be our first event, under-publicised and virgin. But we will be there, with our friends, and hopefully with you.

I’d like to thank the team at Hub Westminster from the depths of my being for their hard work, to manifest such an awe-inspiring space, and for their ambition to do things of significance in the world at a time when most people’s thoughts run to preservation, rather than audacious creation.

There are two more notes.

Firstly, this is just the beginning. TRUTH AND BEAUTY is a place to settle in to the new space, to meet friends, to think and plan. It is designed to be a sustainable anchor, a common ground, a familiar, friendly face. If we enjoy each-other’s company in such space enough to wish to work together to go further, events and conferences and other lecture series and film viewings and workshops and making of things and all manner of other engagement may result. But it all starts with getting the basics right, a cycle of gatherings and friendship, from which all else may grow.

Secondly, in November, I will be finishing my work on The Future We Deserve with three lectures and three brief Unconferences on the topics raised in my talks. I will post full details tomorrow, but the dates are the first three Tuesdays and Thursdays in November.

I hope you will be able to attend.

Thank you so much for your care and support,

Vinay

The Open Workshop

or, unpicking workshop design to create genuinely open exchange

So I’ve been experimenting with various formats for a workshop here in Cloughjordan. I’ve been trying to find something that people were interested enough in doing, and that would get the work out there.

But I realized, after somewhat lukewarm response, that I was thinking too much about “I want to run a workshop and get paid to do it, how do people do that?” This, of course, is Not Helpful, because I’m not like other people, and I’m not teaching what they are teaching, so expecting that their models would work for me is not sensible.

Generally speaking, I try to afford people as much freedom as possible to do what they like with my ideas.

  • things are unbundled
  • there’s no ideology
  • items are public domain, generally speaking
  • I don’t project manage collaborators

What I hadn’t figured out is that I need to do the same in a workshop setting. So here’s what I’m proposing.

  1. You know me and my work, or you wouldn’t be interested in coming to a workshop.
  2. You’ve already got access to a fairly substantial archive of my lectures and papers.
  3. What’s left, then, is individual curiosity about applications.

So if you had the cash, you could just fly out, sit me down for a week, and I could teach you whatever you wanted to know. It might cost you a thousand bucks – Gupta’s private mentoring program, for madmen only, just like the magic theater.

Better, though, might be a chance to get the download on your own terms, with your choice of companions, covering the material that you are most interested in. And you or I could also invite other people (for example, Dougald Hine) to teach at the same time.

So this leads me to The Open Workshop. Here’s the idea.

  1. You find a group of people who want to learn what I have to teach, and figure out with me what the precise syllabus will be.
  2. Your group split the cost of my time and accommodation however you like.
  3. I teach The Thing, whatever it might be, from my repertoire.

And, as I mentioned, you can invite whoever you like to co-teach, or I can bring in specialists if I’m not the best person for a specific aspect of your area of interest.

In terms of costs, accommodation at Django’s Hostel is minimally 105EUR a week. My time, let’s say, is 200EUR a day, but a really involved workshop might take a couple of weeks of planning and preparation on my part, depending on the complexity of the material and the depth of the ask. I think a maximum practicable group size is about two dozen, less for extremely intensive material.

So how do those numbers add up?

  • A one week workshop for 20 people based on material I know well already (one day prep) would cost 165EUR including accommodation.
  • A one week workshop for 12 people, requiring three weeks of prep because it’s material I don’t usually teach and in-depth, with catering, would be about 460EUR.

I should probably be paying myself about twice that amount, but people aren’t exactly beating down my door for an education, and I can always raise prices later if demand warrants. But at this point I think I’ve come up with a recipe which seems right to me – collaboratively creating the experiences that people want, splitting the load of design and putting bums-on-seats with the clients (that’s you) and doing it at a price that my friends can afford. It’s a way of amortizing the cost of putting my attention on your area of interest, basically.

So I’m open to offers and I’ll continue to develop workshop syllabus material as time permits. In the long run, I think it’s what I want to spend my time doing for a while, exploring a more oral, more interactive way of making the work available.

Thanks for your attention!

V>
PS: I’ve put up an editable Google Doc, if people want to do a little thinking together on this.

Goddamn.

Apocalypse

I have reached for the sword.

I can’t or won’t tell you how or when.

Let me then make the argument.

1) We are at seven billion humans now, expected to rise to at least nine billion.

2) If everybody lived like an American, we would need about eight planets. For Europeans the number is about four.

3) Voluntary (individual and community) efforts to reduce environmental impact by changing behavior have been ineffective.

4) Coercive (government) efforts to reduce environmental impact have been effective in some instances (ozone, dioxins) but not on other big environmental threats.

5) Therefore, as consumption continues to increase as the rich continue to find new ways to consume, poor people cease being peasant farmers and get jobs, and population continues to rise, we are going to damage the planet extremely severely, perhaps even kill it.

6) Furthermore, we are giving rise to entirely new classes of threat, including biotechnology and nanotechnology, either one of which could result in massive permanent damage, including completely annihilation, of the world. Our willingness to retain our nuclear capacity speaks volumes about our ability to handle such technologies.

In the long run, if we are going to survive, there are two unambiguous options.

A) A peaceful and sane technological breakthrough, such as ultra-cheap solar panels or safe molecular manufacturing, which allows humans to consume at these rates or higher without killing nature by degrees.

or

B) Global enforcement of planet-saving environmental policies at the expense of human comfort, at least for those consuming most at the moment.

I still believe A) is partially possible, in that we may get the technological breakthroughs. However, most of the advanced novel technologies are used for war, and you are likely to see a Terminator from nanotechnology long before a Cornucopia Machine.

However, B) is much more plausible. The utter destructive, homicidal madness of human beings, as seen in the age of Pol Pot, could arise and turn on hyperconsumers at any time. The bloodshed would be immense, but a planetary interregnum while concerned humans simply tore down the technical foundations of over-consumption to protect the planet is entirely plausible to me – far more so than a simple renunciation of war, and an acceptance of a peaceful high-technology future for humanity.

This is, fundamentally, what has been kicking my ass. This is the crisis.

However I roll the dice, I wind up back here, and I can’t find a way out that gels with what I know. The ultratech solution is fine – apart from the nanowar. The peasant revolution is fine, apart from the machete war.

But all we are doing right now is winching a roller-coaster up and up and up, and the tracks it will roll down go over a cliff, into planetary extinction.

Why are we doing this? Because the dominant cultures on this planet have believed for thousands of years that the way to a better world lies on the other side of a planetary catastrophe called The Apocalypse, in which various horrors from the divine world are unleashed upon the earth, culminating in a global fascism under a single just ruler.

The secret impulse in all hearts to destroy the world is a perverted desire to see the face of god, or some similarly benign condition, upon the face of the earth.

It is bad theology which underlies every belching smoke stack and every abattoir. Nature is not sacred, it is simply the growth medium for humanity, one part to be judged, one part to be saved, to live under unipolar divine law forever more.

Sacred cow becomes sacred hamburger.

Bad myths make bad people.

People like Dick Cheney are demonized. They may, indeed, act like demons, but the special power we afford them, and Hitler, and Mao, and Stalin is the reflected darkness of the Antichrist, the Sum of All Fears, the Adversary, the thing set against God which controls some aspect of the fate of man. We imbue the darker facets of power with a metaphysical horror, an elemental Evil which owes nothing to the pre-Monotheist conceptions of power. A bad king is no longer a bad man, but a facet of The Power Which Opposes, the Heart of Darkness, and eventually, dare we say it, Satan. Our cultural mythology is full of Good Guys, leading us up, and Bad Guys, leading us down. People expect these Agents of Evil to triumph, some literally, creating the need for a just ruler who will reward the innocent and punish the guilty and non-believers. But first the world must die.

If a Hindu fundamentalist had not killed Gandhi in 1948, at 78, Gandhi would have lead the global campaign against nuclear weapons, for world peace. If he had lived to 100, he would have lived all the way through the 1960s, and perhaps provided us with the spiritual leadership we needed to slip the yoke of these evil dreams, and find happiness and freedom on this earth. Imagine the 1960s with Gandhi at its head.

Instead, there was no effective force to oppose the settlement we have with the nuclear issue, Mutually Assured Destruction, which lasts to this very day.

You expect goodness and sanity in a world where we are never more than minutes from complete annihilation if one power group or another presses the red button? The very fact of those weapons is the proof of our madness.

As it is, I fear a dark path is upon us. The cleansing of the world by fire is a deep, deep myth in India culture – the Kalki Avatar, the incarnation of Vishnu who comes “when Thieves dress as Kings” and puts the lot to the sword to make way for a new age. This may be the mythology which killed Gandhi – a man who wished for Gandhi to make war with the Muslims, or at least maintain the sacred barriers of Caste, rather than ushering in peace and egalitarian freedom for all. I wonder if, perhaps, he was killed because he was not Kalki enough. But now I must ask you something.

Do you really believe we’re going to turn this thing around?

Look at the world. We’ve gone crazy. We plod on through our days, and each one of the seven billion of us, or at least the two billion rich, carries a little share of the death of the world and the massacre of the poor within us. One two-billionth share of the death of the world does not seem very much – a hamburger, a six pack and a decent car and house will do it. Our individual shares of the damage seem so small, and so necessary. None of us are responsible because all of us are.

That sword cuts both ways. We, whose over-consumption is killing the world, bear collective responsibilities for our actions.

The polluter pays. We say qui bono, “to who’s advantage” and the answer is, “ours.”

It’s going to get settled by coercive force. It’s probably not going to be governments, because they’re causing most of these problems.

If the world is to live, it’s going to come down to one of two things, and the interaction between them.

i) Hail-Mary pass benign technologies, like Nanosolar, arriving without God Help Us technologies like nanowar.

ii) Effective coercion of polluters and over-consumers from non-state actors. Think Sea Shepherd on steroids.

Both of these, frankly, call for use of coercive force by people who take the survival of the planet a hell of a lot more seriously than governments, who are the number one threat to it right now, given their nuclear stockpiles and sponsorship of insanely destructive technologies on all sides.

Corporations are not the problem. Governments which allow them to run amok are the problem. Voters allow governments to run amuck, voters are the problem. Voters = buyers = consumers = We The People are The Problem.

Because right at the bottom of it, in some narrow little Freudian place, you don’t care what we’re doing to the planet, because when it dies, Jesus comes back.

Now I don’t know if this analysis is correct. I am going through a dark patch here, and I’m putting this out here for discussion. Perhaps there’s a different explanation.

But I cannot see, for the life of me, that this doesn’t all root back into the desire to end the world in pursuit of something better than life. That’s what we’re buying at the mall: little unitized packets of the death of the world, packaged into products, and enjoyed not in spite of, but because of, the worldeath they represent.

Bad myths make bad people.

When the time comes, as it might, we may all be forced to consider the role of violence and bad mythology at the roots of our culture.

The world is not guaranteed a future, and neither are we. It may, or may not, all just work out this time, as it has for humanity every other time.

It is different now, because we ourselves are in charge.

Nearly everything about cars and houses is controlled by the State, and as a result, they completely suck from an energy and environment perspective. All innovation is crushed flat. Most of heavy industry likewise – subsidies for what is old and dirty, disincentives for what is new and clean. Consider nuclear vs. renewable subsidies, when all costs are taken into account. Are we really so stupid we can’t make a green car and a green house? No! But the aggregated will-to-destroy in people, bad myths, leads us to accept this fate as our own. We will ruin the global economy for futile religious wars in the middle east, but not tax carbon slightly to encourage the move towards a sustainable world – a world with a future.

I don’t know how you dig 6,000 years plus of bad software out of something without a reformat.

Maybe Kalki was right.

My continuing crisis

Soundtrack:

It’s hard to know what started it. It was ongoing when I left London for Cloughjordan. It might have started when Bembo Davies showed me that what I was doing was terrible theater, just did not work. It might be an impending 40th birthday. More than anything, it might be my work starting to hit maturity.

This year’s Burning Man was the critical arrival of the Hexayurt Project. Reports are coming in, apparently it was a great success. We know that Edmund Harriss’s big hexayurt-domes (we’re still figuring out nomenclature!) were built. There were networks of hexayurts. There were a lot of hexayurts. I’ll start posting structured roundups on what happened out there soon, as news comes in.

More than anything, I am struggling with my own powerlessness. I am, by any reasonable standards, an exceptional human being. There are a handful of people in the world who combine my degree of raw intellectual firepower and commitment to change. Many of the long bets I’ve made are coming in, and the core of my last decade’s worth of work is well-established in the world. I believe we’ll see real, significant, substantial hexayurt deployments in the developing world off the awareness generated at this year’s Burning Man, and then the project will stand on its own feet all the way. And I feel startlingly unequal to the problems we face as a species. I’m at full deployment and then some, and even in the sector that I’m working, I’m barely making a scratch.

The powerlessness thing even though, by any objective standards, I’m winning on every axis except financially, is hitting me harder and harder these days. Even if everything I’m doing goes to its full extent, from the Resilience Designer stuff through to The Future We Deserve and the mass deployment of hexayurts and simple critical infrastructure maps, it’s not going to be enough.

It’s that scene from The Man Who Fell To Earth where he piles up the money from the briefcase of basic patents based on his alien technology, and realizes it won’t be enough money to build what he came to create. (minimal spoilers)

What defines enough?

A one-world lifestyle for all human beings.

I’m willing to use the coercive force of the State to this end. I’m willing to use my own life to this end. I’m willing to over-reach and breakthrough to this end. I’m willing to lead, up to a point, to this end. But I cannot do this, I can’t even make it possible, alone. The culture which could actually make this happen does not exist yet.

I have two points of reference left in this landscape. The Unplugged which describes a social movement which could Solve The Problem, and Open Source Ecology which is a real, functioning, higher standard of living relocalization-and-open-source project.

(resilience, relocalization and open source – RRAOS – might be a term for future use.)

Open Source Ecology needs help. They’re possibly our best shot – the ideas, and to some degree the team, at Solving The Real Problem. It’s one of the few efforts where you can say “if we did this, all of it, it would actually make a real dent.” If you’re looking for something to do which will help, help there. I think cold hard cash is probably a better approach than volunteering unless you have specific skills they need, but read up and see where you fit in.

But again, I am avoiding the crisis. I don’t believe in my own plan. The level of engagement it would take to do this and win, globally, is more than I can imagine.

Think about that: I don’t think we can do it.

It is not that I have given up, but I am now moving forwards blindly, with just the outline of a plan and some principles, rather than moving along a planned axis. Up until now I have had a plan I believed in, which was basically reboot Buckminster Fuller’s work by infusing it with open source principles, and make Gandhi’s models practical on that technology base.

I’ve given it five solid years, basically full-time, and five years before than in prep. We have one technology out of that process, the hexayurt, and one perspective, the stuff in the Gupta State Failure Management Archive.

Not enough. Some bad luck, some active resistance, some misjudgment. We nearly got a big hexayurt deployment in Haiti. We nearly got a much more profound appropriate technology program at the Pentagon. Lot of near-misses.

I’ve failed to deliver the revolutionary change I had hoped to ignite.

And it doesn’t matter. Because I never did what I did because I hoped. I did what I did because it’s what I am for. When the mains came on in Spring of 2001, when I finally got hold of life properly, I knew this is what I was going to do, in some sense. And I’m going to continue doing it, but the ongoing crisis of not being able to find a strategy I believe can produce the transformation I was hoping for is just that – an ongoing crisis.

I can’t push any harder, I don’t know how to work any smarter, and it’s not enough.

Now what?

KBO, Keep Buggering On as Churchill said. I did say I expected the hexayurt to take until 2018 until there for the first large-scale deployment, 15 years from Burning Man 2003, when the first hexayurt ever was built. And now we have the domes, we can do first-world housing. And the cheap solar may yet come, at least it’s getting cheaper year-by-year. But even if we get these toe-holds, it’s not going to get to the scenario described in The Unplugged where we actually get a substantial number of first-world people back off the grid, off capitalism, and into a lifestyle who’s research-and-development spending helps the poor farmers too.

So at that point, I’m out of cards and out of plan. I’m going to keep shipping components, and I hope that someone out there has a use for them, because I can’t get this fire started. But I can keep chopping wood.

Personally, I’m fine. People often use “crisis” to indicate a condition where they need help, and I’m more indicating a point of radical change, a breaking point. I’ll continue making weird squeaking noises and accommodating to reality, but this should not be interpreted as a cry for help. I may have to sit at the bottom of the well for a few more months until things start making sense again, but what’s the point of being a yogi if a season in hell dissuades you from your course, eh? It’s just a case of sitting with the problem until the pressure of consciousness forces transformation.

I just thought you should know.

On being a mad cultist

My Templars of Earth statement seems to have ruffled quite a lot of feathers. These feathers seem to be in three general categories.

  • People who don’t like the militarism.
  • People who think its a secret society
  • People who don’t get the esotericism

It’s Templar because it deals with life-and-death struggles, albeit not armed ones, and in such terrain you have two choices: doctors and soldiers. Most other professional cultures don’t touch life and death directly. Doctors witness it. Soldiers live in it. Therefore the soldier metaphor is closer to the consciousness of those engaged in the struggles of the world in which they live than the doctor metaphor.

It’s not a secret society, and even if it was, so what? But I’ll get to that in a minute. Public group, open to all at least for the moment. Nothing up my sleeves.

Finally, the esotericism. There’s only a couple of ways to put this, so I’m going to use all of them.

  • People openly believe, in large numbers, that a 2000-year-dead dead rabbi is going to return to life to judge the human race, and that’s normal.
  • Most of the people I know who are able to handle the load of being single individual self-started agents of global change meditate. Most of them meditated for years before becoming socially engaged. Some are probably enlightened, whether they know or care varies.
  • I learned damn near everything I know about life from ancient wisdom traditions, some western, some eastern, some public, some secretive, and some simply beyond comprehension. And the dominant culture has tried to kill those sacred threads from time to time for a thousand years or more. Inquisitions, crusades, jihads. Burn the witches, behead the sufis, you know the drill.

It is not coincidence that so many of the people out here making real change in the world did some kind of heavy inner work first. It’s where we get the fortitude to stand up to the slow sliding of the world off the cliff in a consumerist waking nightmare.

However, as I’ve noted elsewhere, I don’t teach. My own lineage did not complete the training required for me to teach, and I’m unsuited to it by character. People looking for an actual teacher of this stuff should talk to Alan Chapman who’s excellently positioned to teach, and has been through broadly similar territory to me, in that he’s done both the sitting-on-your-ass thing, and the esoteric tradition thing. Can’t promise you he’ll be the right guy for you, but I trust him enough to tell people to talk to Alan first if they’re serious about Learning This Stuff.

These are the books that I’d recommend, if you’re a reader.

That, right there, is the psychological foundation and the modern retellings of the myths and stories of the Heros. I’d note that it’s very, very worthwhile reading The Invisibles and Promethea in the same year; either one alone doesn’t quite capture some essence of the thing. Alan Moore has the God’s Eye View and Grant Morrison was right in the thick of it. They are good compliments.

In terms of practice manuals, I’m hesitant to recommend, but must.

What’s missing here is any decent guide to unmodified Western-style bell, book and candle ritual. That’s because, right now, I can’t think of one that I can recommend. That should be interpreted as a warning. Everything that comes off the Golden Dawn line, even orthodox Thelema, seems to be tainted. You also have to watch out for the more totalitarian streams of Buddhism, too. In general, “we have the Only Way” is a symptom of people who have only partial realization. If the truth is embodied in single teachers who are dead you’re looking at a museum, not a path. If, on the other hand, the truth is seen as continually rediscovered by each generation of practitioners then, even if they’re working from ancient discoveries, you’re probably fine. I’ve met realized masters from every path, they’re just further from the center in more dogmatic environments. The Truth will out! Oh, and watch out for drugs: you get about five years of good times, sometimes less, then they become a rut. Start meditating regularly at least a year before you plan to stop taking them, or you may find the world very rigid and static when you stop.

There are three very simple phases to spiritual development.

  • Slowly realizing that everything is inside your head. Most “objective reality” is mere social convention.
  • Slowly realizing that other people are real. You can’t change the mind of a four year old, never mind a world.
  • Slowly realizing that you are just like them. At the seat of being, we’re all just alike!

At the end of it, you might know how the world works, you might have seen fundamental truth, you might know yourself to be a reincarnate buddha, a wizard, a god, a dragon or just some guy with a taste for beer and curry. But if you got it right, you’ll also know that you were always that mythic self, even as a child, and everybody is also profoundly great and magnificent at that same level of spiritual truth.

There are a bunch of identifiable phases, some well documented, some not – pretty much everybody goes through depth psychology, meets archetypal forces. Some go through a phase of extreme synchronicity – Jung himself did, that’s why we have a word for it. If that period coincides with magical practice, one can wind up with very strange ideas about the world indeed. Various occult capacities which normally slumber in the self can surface, but pretty soon you realize that children are doing all that stuff because nobody told them not to, and it’s just normal human capacities that our culture suppresses, just like like our sense of smell. If you’re persistent, you might hit evolutionary forces and start talking about Destiny and the Good of the Human Species, or even All Life. All of that stuff is steps on the way to being ordinary.

I’m not doing a very good job of being ordinary because the world is a mess and I’ve been called to do something about it by virtue of being in the right place at the right time to help, and no reasonable being can turn their back on those in need.

But if you want a settled, nice, normal life, you don’t need to touch the spiritual world. Everything which is there, is there now. Things are fine, just as they are. All that you would discover is already true and within you, whether you know it consciously or not.

If you set your foot on the path at a time like this, you risk being shanghaied into trying to solve the world’s problems, and whatever expanded durability or capability you discover within yourself can be taxed to the full by the challenges we face as a species and as a world.

The dominant species should not be killing the world it lives on. Something has gone wrong.

The dividing line is that, regardless of what anybody tells you, that is a temporal problem. It might have mythic or shamanic overtones, but real spirituality is about the discovery of the nature of being, not about worrying too much about the insanity of a particular culture, place and time.

So, 1400 words into a post I did not have the time to write, let me make the point.

  1. We have a dreadful problem which has clear mythopoetic overtones.
  2. That problem has nothing at all to do with the fundamental spiritual nature of being.

It is very, very hard as an early-stage practitioner, or as an adult who’s had glimpses, which is most of us, to distinguish between “we seem to be killing the world” and “god or man is inherently evil.” But it’s a distinction you must hold true to, or you’re going to get fifteen feet up the path and wind up as cannon fodder.

You have the right to come to spiritual understanding without picking up the burdens of the world.

You have the right to pick up the burdens of the world without without mandatory additional spiritual learning or indoctrination.

Nobody should be applying any metaphysical technique to try and fix the problems of the world without clear technical guidance from an enlightened (or equivalent) master, or (much better) being enlightened themselves.

Even in the midst of the darkness, what is fundamentally true and real remains so, regardless of all temporal circumstances.

This division is an Indian cultural framework, and has ties to things like renunciation and, yes, caste. But I’m stating it as “these are the rules as I understand them.” Other people may have other opinions, but these are mine, and I can explain them in Hindu theological terms if people prefer.

You can think of these things as human rights. The temptation to mass produce half initiates as cannon fodder in the attempt to square what’s wrong with the world is very real, and any cult with a social change agenda, right down to the Hare Krishnas, does it. But to saddle people with the problems of the world in the process of their spiritual education is wrong, as wrong as government abuse of detainees, a draft, or any other State abuse of humans in their effort to meet the State’s goals. Likewise spiritual indoctrination of those who just want to help, and wind up being pushed into new belief systems by peer pressure in the process.

I’m writing this today to clear my own position, so that everybody understands where I’m at on Templars of Earth, and also why I do not teach. I’m vastly too encumbered to do it right, and the temptation to hand students slabs of trouble and say “here, you deal with this one” would be extremely strong, particularly in my more overloaded periods.

If, on the other hand, you’re already in the territory, and encumbered by the problems of the world, feel free to contact me. I don’t teach, that’s not the same thing as saying that I won’t help.

I’m extremely reluctant to talk metaphysics right now. I’m trying to keep it to the bare minimum which is consistent with honesty. I hope you’ll respect that.

V>

Templars of Earth

Say only

I understand and accept fully that the human race is harming the natural world by driving species to extinction, releasing long-lived pollutants, changing the climate and poisoning nature.

I understand and accept fully that the human race makes many suffer horribly and die in war, famine, injustice, poverty and oppression, and that we are not choosing to provide a good life for all of humanity.

I understand and fully accept that my own efforts appear unequal to the task of changing these facts.

I swear by the bones of the earth, the roots of the mountains to always treat those who understand and accept fully these Three Truths with dignity and respect, myself included.

Make a badge or banner, by any means, of this design.

You are now a templar of Earth. Display the symbol as you will.


A templar is a soldier, a warrior. But as I said earlier, at this point, and perhaps always, violence is pointless. However, to counteract the struggles and isolation of knowing, seeing and feeling these unbearable truths, I enact the formation of a modern Templar movement.

I don’t do this lightly. You’ve seen me struggling for weeks or months with the pressure to do something, to pick a direction for the energy and awareness pushing me to action. Nothing that I’ve been able to find has had the heft required to make a dent in the problem of how to step operations up. I’ve been pushed further and deeper in my thought, but without the kind of breakthrough that satisfied the times.

So I’ve fallen back on something old, and something that I know works – the guild. Let me tell you why Templars. Freemasonry gave us two major innovations, science and secular democracy. Yet Masonry itself does little which would lead one to think in terms of revolutions in human thought – what it teaches it teaches by good example and symbolic gesture. From these practices come trust and insight, and trust and insight between people can generate all else.

I looked at that example, and thought “I don’t know what to do, but I do know that the people who are doing the best work in this domain are isolated and alone, and share no banner. There’s mutual respect, but in the absence of a shared platform, little mutual aid.” Yet we have not and are not likely to agree a shared platform. Perhaps there is something to a guild, where there is mutual respect and mutual support, but from a much broader and more inclusive foundation.

I’d like to see a situation where those who are most directly feeling the load can turn to each-other, under these bonds of common humanity and recognition, dignity and respect, and see a way past whatever differences they have to help each-other continue their work in the world, towards victory over our destruction of nature, and our destruction of one-another. Where there are differences, there can still be respect and dignity.

It is a big ask to raise a common banner. To pick something as archaic and mystical as a Templar flag and an oath is quaint. Yet I know of nothing else that I believe has the power to solidify what is between people: a political party will not do it, and there is no religion. Many of those who stand strongest on these issues do so from their own personal spiritual foundation, of whatever nature. This is not coincidence – there is vast strength within us.

If you struggle with this knowledge, and are willing to commit to dignity and respect between those who share that struggle in whatever form, you may choose to swear the oath, use the symbol and the name, and commit to always treat those who are fighting the good fight with dignity and respect. This does not mean that we put our differences aside, as the resolution of the problems of the world require us to be clear about such distinctions. It does ask for and engage a higher level of acknowledgment between those engaged in this struggle.

So that’s what I have for you: an oath, a symbol and a name. What you do with them is up to you, but I will be here, under this banner, for the time being.

I am a templar of Earth.

Hail, and welcome.

It is as if…

Right. Can’t sleep. Things needed done, and said.

Let me frame this clearly: the dominant species is killing the planet. We are obsessed with political trivia and the defense of fantastic constructs like banks, while ignoring the biological and human holocaust we are unleashing on every side. Children starve, nuclear weapons slumber in their silos, and the ultra-rich buy second yachts.

The wrongness, when you stop to think about it, is palpable. But the individualistic logic of material accumulation persuades us that all action outside of putting one foot in front of the other on the path to destruction is, in some sense, just not what people do. We continue to walk. We are enslaved by bad stories. And if you stop playing the game as it is framed, you will become homeless or broken, because the money must flow or there is no reason for you existing.

What the fuck are we doing?

Money is a unitized packet of violence. You can tell this because there are many actions you can perform if you have money, like taking an object from a shop, which will incite violence if you do not have money. The money itself comes from destructive and coercive practices almost without exception. The economy is murder.

“How can you expect fairness or decency on a planet of sleeping people?” (G.I. Gurdjieff). (see)

Now, all I can say is “watch the part of you that takes this in, but won’t act differently because of it.”

That’s Satan. I don’t mean that literally, but it’s as good a concept as any for that part of human nature which simply refuses to change even in the face of overwhelming evidence that we are destroying each-other and the world.

Just stop and look at it. You see it when you light a cigarette. You see it when you want to buy a nicer car. You see it when you make excuses, particularly for our political leadership. It’s every Catholic tithing money to an organization which makes NAMBLA look like amateurs. It’s every Democrat ignoring Guantanamo Bay now that Obama is in charge of it. It’s every Republican pretending that Obama made the national debt.

Everywhere around you is the Black Iron Prison. We just sort of keep on going.

I dug my heels in hard. I’ve tried to say “stop, this is insane.” I’ve packaged it as policy. I’ve built it as technology. I’ve tried to avoid any kind of mass movement. They never seem to achieve their goals.

I want you to consider the possibility that the culture you are living in is sick, literally mentally ill. We know it can happen to people. We know it can happen to groups, like cults.

Here we are, sane, free people in the Cult of Late State Nuclear Capitalism, watching as our insane culture destroys the planet that supports us all.

When you think of it as mass mental illness, perhaps built of many individual madnesses combined in a whole-more-than-the-sum-of-its-parts you can see it all with a horrific clarity.

We are killing the world we live on.

We will not stop, because doing so might make us poorer.

What you are seeing is a confluence of evolutionary ratchet behavior with complex systems, producing vast mass pathologies which don’t seem to have any origination point. Little things within us, magnified by social effects, turn our collective organizations like churches, markets and governments into monsters.

This is what we’re looking at, folks. Individual transformation to the point where we can have sane groups is Not Likely. Reforming the groups without changing the people seems equally hopeless.

All I’ve got for you is “classify it as madness, and stop participating as soon as possible.”

For me, that looked like abandoning ideas of “success” and working as hard as I could on the root problems, for free.

What’s your move?

Managing the Wrath of God – a Primer

For years, my primary spiritual practice was Achalanatha, who in Buddhism is rendered as a protector of the right of women to become enlightened, although I was trained in a Hindu lineage, where such a right is not even conceivably questionable, by an extraordinarily ferocious female teacher, a Grandmother from Hell if you will.

Anyway, this is an aside. If you look at the face of that particular deity, it is the face of implacable rage. I’ve worn that face in places you would not believe. I have been, at times, the embodiment of the Wrath of God, or at least as close as 20 years of spiritual practice can get you in a pinch, which is close enough for government work.

So I know how to get angry, and yet retain the cutting edge of my intellect in the midst of rage. It’s a very, very scary combination, and not something that I unleash for less than 1% mortality, generally speaking. It’s a weapon of last resort.

I want to explain why I’m not using it.


People sometimes ask me why I haven’t thrown my weight behind protests or revolution. The answer is simple. I don’t know what to do next.less than a minute ago via TweetDeck Favorite Retweet Reply

I’m angry. I’m angry enough to kill, if it would solve the world’s problems. That’s a problem, and its a fact. The problem is there is no target. I’m angry enough to kill, but I’m mentally clear enough to know that it will not and cannot help. I don’t know if Gandhi was angry and had resolve, or simply did not metabolize anger into violence, or was not angry, but nothing makes my real state of spiritual development as clear to me as my disposition towards violence. Carrying such anger is a spiritual function, perhaps someone has to do it, but the very high, very clear people do not; ergo I am not one such. Yet even as I look at the economic genocide and the ecocidal nature of the civilization we are in, I do not go Derrick Jensen.

I want to explain why not. Right now, violence won’t solve anything. The threat of violence might compel change or protect green shoots of change in some instances, but we don’t have problems which can be solved at gun point. We have global problems, and nobody has a big enough gun. It may well be that the Gandhian insight is that violence is never the answer, but if that’s the case, I have not realized it for myself yet. All I know is that right now violence is going to be intensely counter-productive, and we should not commit it. It may well be that I’ll always feel that way, because the situation will simply never be right, and that would be an engineering approximation to Gandhi’s insight.

I am on the side of peace, even wrong, unjust peace, for the time being.

I don’t know if that will ever change. Perhaps if I lived in a genocide zone, and it was outside my door. Perhaps if there was a revolution who’s values I completely believed in as a genuine, deep, permanent solution to the problems of industrialization and ultratechnology. There are a lot of perhapses. But right now, and for the foreseeable future, I remain a murderously angry man of peace.

It’s not an easy position to hold, but if anybody is looking for a navigational steer, particularly in the context of possible large scale political violence in America in response to (for example) perceived electoral fraud or Constitutional challenge, that’s my steer.

No violence that cannot be committed with a completely clear head, evaluating the costs and benefits in a fair-minded manner. Practically speaking, that may become a very close approximation to no violence, ever if one is mentally clear enough.

I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.

You don’t have to be a good person to practice non-violence. You just have to refuse to pick up the gun when the opportunity to become that kind of a part of history is passed to you. As Timothy Leary once said, when asked about Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” campaign

“It should be ‘Just Say No Thank You’! It’s terrible how they don’t teach good manners any more!”

We need a global cooperative solution, not the ecological and social justice versions of Baader-Meinhoff, urban guerillas playing into reactionary hands. We need to design a feasible one-planet lifestyle for everybody (see), and until that is designed, prototyped and implemented on a fairly wide scale, no amount of kicking against “the system” is any more than sawing off the branch we are all sitting on: it’s stupid and dumb, and could destroy the resources we need for a global cooperative resolution to our world’s problems.

I’m speaking more about concrete politics, rather than my more abstract previous work, because I sense than in the next year (or, given my typical prescience, later this decade) these kinds of issues are going to matter. I want you to know that I’ve been giving them deep thought now, and this is my conclusion.

Violence which will not solve the problem is stupid, needless killing.
Right now, no path exists by which violence can solve the problem.
Therefor, and possibly always, violence remains stupid and needless.

(*refer to that link if you want to understand why I term Gandhi “Emperor” – it is partly humorous)