March 2007


The Indian Beatles

More from the infamous Jason Louv.

Mar 31 2007 11:33 pm | The Global Picture and Trivia and Media | No Comments »

The Clintons from the 70s and 80s

From the New Shelton Wet and Dry

Bill And Hillary Clinton70

Mar 31 2007 09:47 pm | Trivia and Media | No Comments »

Quote

WORK FUCKER WORK

WORK HARDER

HARDER

STOP WHINING

WORK

WORK DAMMIT

DO THEY CALL IT THE GREAT WHINE?

THE GREAT BOOK COLLECTING OFF EBAY?

THE GREAT DANCNG AROUND IN ROBES AND COMPARING WANDS?

THE GREAT HARPING ON ABOUT RELIGIOUS UNITY?

FUCK NO!

IT’S CALLED THE GREAT WORK MOTHERFUCKERS!

SO GET TO FUCKING WORK ALREADY!!!!!!!!!

Jason Louv

Mar 30 2007 09:52 pm | Personal | No Comments »

Dammit, I’m getting future shock

Unbelievably cool virtual musical instruments.

Mar 30 2007 07:23 pm | Personal and Science | No Comments »

Somebody cancel the future. Now, while there is still time

Watch the clip of the Japanese snake robot. Then think about the bots in The Matrix. Then go change your underwear.

I’m not ready for this. Nobody is. Future Shock here we come.

Mar 30 2007 03:10 pm | Science | No Comments »

Amazing video of people on giant steel spring-stilts

You could totally break your everything on these!

Mar 30 2007 12:43 pm | Trivia and Media | No Comments »

I’m saving this for later

Ganesha’s Skinhead Army

Mar 29 2007 11:17 pm | Everything Else | No Comments »

Hans Rosling of GapMinder presenting at TED (video)

The Sietch does it again.

Really a great piece. You should watch this, it is extremely excellent. He’s very simple and straight forward and kind of academic, but gets straight to the core of the issues in a way I have not seen before.

Mar 29 2007 09:35 am | The Global Picture | No Comments »

OH MY GOD

Kermit the Frog sings Hurt by Nine Inch Nails

Mar 28 2007 11:57 pm | Trivia and Media | 1 Comment »

Humane Human Footprint

Alex Steffan is blathering on over at WorldChanging about how we can consume our way out of the problem. I am replying.


We can’t buy our way to a better future.

But we can ban our way there.

Years ago I said “we’ll know when people are getting serious about global warming when governments start to ban incandescent lightbulbs” and, as you’ve seen in the news, that time is now.

Consumers did not shift. Even though it made financial sense, even though it was undeniably good for the planet, consumers did not shift. How many of you have 100% CF bulbs in your house?

Not many, I’ll wager.

So, no. The forward move is things like CAFE standards and banning outdated, inefficient technologies. You might choose to tax them out of existence rather than just outlaw them, because you know in a Bruce Sterling sense, incandescent bulbs are going to become fashionable contraband… smuggled, used for lighting art… “he’s a real collector of the past… **incandescents**”

But we’re going to get progress here by chopping off the past, not by purchasing the future, I think.


OK, let’s make this simple.

Take the “sustainable harvest” of the planet - everything we can use without degrading the system further and reducing future yields. So much electricity, so much wood, so much rice and so on.

Now, divide that up evenly among the human race. That quantity of materials is your “humane human footprint” - the amount of stuff you can use without stepping on anybody else’s toes. You may believe you are entitled to more through free market competition, or that people should be *forced* to consume only these amounts - that’s politics. I’m just saying this is the quantity you *can* consume without harming either the planet or yourself.

How much over that figure are you? x200? x500? x1000?

I understand that your family doesn’t like CF bulbs. I think there is a lot that could be improved. Just don’t forget the big picture.

Mar 28 2007 01:49 pm | Science | 1 Comment »

Next Page »